Struggling to Connect the Dots in Your Research Proposal?

You’ve got a great idea… but your supervisor keeps asking:

“How does this all fit together?”

“Where’s the gap?”

“Why this method?”

You’re not alone. Most Masters and PhD students waste weeks revising misaligned proposals — only to face rejection or endless feedback loops.

But it doesn’t have to be this way.

The Structured Framework to Design a Coherent, Supervisor-Ready Proposal — From Title to Contribution

In this 5-unit course, you’ll learn to weave the golden thread of alignment through every section of your proposal using my proven Empirical & Literature Review Alignment Templates.

No guesswork. No vague connections. Just a logically structured, intellectually sound proposal that earns approval with confidence.

What You’ll Get Inside the Course

Unit 1 How to use the Empirical and Literature Review Proposal Skeletons to design a fully aligned study from the ground up. Check out this Youtube video for a sample of what you will be learning about.

Unit 2 & 3 Step-by-step alignment diagnostics to test and strengthen every link in your proposal’s logic

Unit 4 Exemplar dissection — see how I evaluate real proposals for coherence, rigor, and clarity

Unit 5 Polished templates, checklists, and refinement tools to elevate your proposal to publication-ready quality

This Course Is About Getting It Right — Not Just Getting It Done

• Precision. Every element — aim, rationale, method, analysis — must earn its place.
• Universal rigor. Works for qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, systematic reviews, or scoping reviews.
• Built for clarity. Ideal for Masters, PhD, and early-career researchers who want coherence, not confusion.
• Supervisor-approved. Developed from years of reviewing hundreds of proposals — I know what they’re looking for.